|
Mawaiz Khan Akash
The recession is opening up a big gap in output performance
between the chemical industries of the developed and developing
worlds, which will continue to widen over the next few years.
While the chemical sectors of western Europe, North America and
Japan struggle to make up the ground they lost after the
financial crisis in late 2008, chemical producers in the
emerging economies of countries such as China, India and Brazil
are using expanding domestic demand to grab a larger share of
the global chemicals market. In Europe chemicals output,
excluding
pharmaceuticals,
fell by 12 per cent in 2009, according to the European Chemical
Industry Council (Cefic). But by the last quarter it was already
showing a slight increase, which Cefic believes will gather pace
in early 2010 to provide an overall rise in production of around
5 per cent during the year.
The American Chemistry Industry Council (ACC) expects US
chemicals production, excluding pharmaceuticals, to grow by 3
per cent in 2010 after falling by 9.4 per cent in 2009. However,
the predicted growth in 2010 in both Europe and the US will
still leave output levels well below those before the recession.
The financial turmoil of 2008 cut US and western European
chemicals production by 15-16 per cent. By the end of 2010
Europe's chemicals production will not only be 11 per cent lower
than that in the first quarter of 2008 but even over 5 per cent
lower than that in early 2005.
'2010 will be a transition period after the European chemical
industry bounced off the bottom in 2009 with the help of
government stimulus measures such as car scrappage schemes,'
says Alan Eastwood, economic advisor to the UK Chemical
Industries Association (CIA) and chairman of Cefic's economic
forecasting group. 'We will still have some way to go before we
reach a position of full recovery from the recession,' he adds.
The emerging economies were also hit by the recession but not so
hard as those of the industrialised countries. As a result their
chemical and other manufacturing sectors have bounced back much
more quickly. Chemicals production in fast growing nations such
as Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) actually increased by
an average of 12.3 per cent in 2009 after a slowdown to 2.7 per
cent in the previous year, according to Oxford Economics, a
consultancy in Oxford, UK, which uses a forecasting model
covering 70 countries worldwide. In 2010 it is predicting
average BRIC's chemical production will rise by 13.4 per cent.
'The latest 2009 third-quarter figures show that there has been
much stronger pickup in demand for chemicals than previously
expected, especially in the emerging economies,' explains David
Thomas, chemicals consultant at Oxford Economics. 'As a result
total chemicals production worldwide will be higher than
forecast in late 2009 and early 2010,' he says. 'We are already
seeing global output returning to only 2 per cent less than what
it was at the peak of 2007.'
The major impetus behind the relatively quick rebound in demand
in the developing world is the buoyancy of the economy in China
where the government has launched a massive financial stimulus
programme to counteract the economic downturn. Most forecasters
reckon that China will record the highest rise in chemicals
output in 2010. Oxford Economics predicts that in 2010 chemical
output will increase by 16 per cent after a 16.5 per cent jump
in 2009. 'China is already accounting for 17 per cent of the
world's chemical output,' says Thomas. 'The high growth in
chemical production will continue in 2010 because of the large
number of new chemical plants due to come on stream in the
country during the year. Their output will slow down the big
inflow of imports into China.' One beneficiary of this enlarged
stream of imports into China has been basic chemical producers
in the US. They have been able to take advantage of the weak
dollar and also cheap natural gas, which has driven down the
cost of petrochemical feedstocks. US natural gas prices have
fallen by 30 per cent in the past year.
'The big rise in exports of basic chemicals has been the
surprising success story of the US chemical industry in 2009,'
says Kevin Swift, ACC's chief economist. 'In the first 10 months
of the year, exports of bulk plastics went up by 21.5 per cent
compared to the same period in 2008 - most of them being shipped
to China and elsewhere in eastern Asia. This was at a time when
plastics production in the US actually fell - by 2.5 per cent.'
The surge in exports of US basic chemicals helped the country
transform a $2.6 billion chemicals trade deficit in 2008 to a
$2.4 billion surplus in 2009, the US industry's best trade
performance for nine years. In 2010 it will do even better with
a predicted $3.9 billion surplus.
The big expansion in China's chemicals capacity will curb an
expected influx of bulk chemical imports from the Middle East
where over 50 petrochemical plants and derivatives are due to
come on stream by 2012.
Much of Middle East's additional capacity of around 35 million
tonnes per year has been destined for China. Instead, a large
proportion of it could be diverted to Europe and, to a lesser
extent, North America.
Already Middle Eastern players like Saudi Arabia's Saudi Basic
Industries Corporation (Sabic), now one of the world's largest
petrochemicals producers, has a distribution network in place in
Europe. Intensified competition from imports, like those from
the Middle East, will put extra pressure in 2010 on European
producers whose domestic customers will continue to be cautious.
'Despite the growth in output, companies will still be keeping
their inventories relatively low because of uncertainties about
the future,' says Henrik Meinche, senior economist at the German
Chemical Industry Association (VCI). 'They will be planning
their orders month by month rather than in terms of quarters.'
'By the end of 2010 and early 2011 we should see the first signs
of a full recovery,' he continues. 'Companies will become much
more optimistic. They will start to worry about whether they
have enough raw materials to meet stronger demand and as a
result build up inventories to more normal levels.'
Nonetheless Meinche, along with other European forecasters, is
not expecting European chemical output to climb back to
pre-recession levels until 2012-2013. Similarly, the ACC
believes that three years of steady output growth averaging 3 to
4 per cent will be needed to make up the lost production.
'It is going to be a slow process,' says Swift. 'Some of our
major customer industries will take even longer to recover. The
US automobile sector may not get back to its previous peak
output levels for 5-6 years or even longer.'
With prospects of a lengthy period of sluggish growth in demand
in their domestic markets, chemical producers in industrialised
countries are holding back capital investment. In the US, the
ACC expects it to have fallen by over 20 per cent in 2009-2010.
Meanwhile much of the world's investment in chemical plants is
taking place in the developing world, putting its emerging
economies in a strong position to become an even more powerful
force in the global chemical market.
'Around 80 per cent of new chemical capacity is being built in
emerging countries, while in Europe and North America plants are
being closed which will never be replaced,' says Thomas. 'The
emerging economies already account for 40 per cent of global
chemicals production. They are well on track to providing over
half by 2020.'
Forecasters are warning about the dangers of a double-dip
recession caused by factors like the premature withdrawal of
government stimulation funds or another financial crisis
triggered by bank failures. But these are thought more likely to
affect the industrialised world. It would take a major upheaval
to stop the advance of the emerging economies and their chemical
sectors.
mawaiz.khan@businessmonitorpk.com |